Arnett v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “An ALJ must evaluate all relevant evidence when determining an applicant’s RFC, including evidence of impairments that are not severe.” (citations omitted)
• “An ALJ must evaluate all relevant evidence when determining an applicant’s RFC, including evidence of impairments that are not severe.” (citations omitted)
• “Although an ALJ need not mention every snippet of evidence in the record, the ALJ must connect the evidence to the conclusion; in so doing, he may not ignore entire lines of contrary evidence.”
• “Although an ALJ need not mention every snippet of evidence in the record, the ALJ must connect the evidence to the conclusion; in so doing, he may not ignore entire lines of contrary evidence.”
• ALJ may not ignore entire lines of contrary evidence
• ALJ “may not ignore entire lines of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).