Seventh Circuit· 4/2/2012

Arnett v. Astrue

Citations

676 F.3d 586
2012 WL 1071707
2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 6557

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“An ALJ must evaluate all relevant evidence when determining an applicant’s RFC, including evidence of impairments that are not severe.” (citations omitted)
“An ALJ must evaluate all relevant evidence when determining an applicant’s RFC, including evidence of impairments that are not severe.” (citations omitted)
“Although an ALJ need not mention every snippet of evidence in the record, the ALJ must connect the evidence to the conclusion; in so doing, he may not ignore entire lines of contrary evidence.”
“Although an ALJ need not mention every snippet of evidence in the record, the ALJ must connect the evidence to the conclusion; in so doing, he may not ignore entire lines of contrary evidence.”
ALJ may not ignore entire lines of contrary evidence
ALJ “may not ignore entire lines of evidence”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Posner, Manion, Wood

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.