Terry v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that Reasoning Level 3 was not inconsistent with ability to perform only “simple” work
• noting that it is \the ALJ's obligation to develop the record\ before concluding the claimant's purported issues have been cured
• noting that even where impairments would “not on their own be disabling, that would only justify discounting their severity, not ignoring them altogether”
• noting that ALJ need only investigate “apparent” conflict between VE testimony and DOT
• faulting an ALJ for failing to resolve a conflict in the opinions of the medical experts
• finding the ALJ erred by not considering two separate, additional impairments

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).