Bonnie Shramek v. Kenneth S. Apfel, Commissioner of Social Security

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the court gives an ALJ’s “opinion a commonsensical reading rather than nitpicking at it”
• noting that the Court should “give the opinion a commonsensical reading rather than nitpicking at it” (citation omitted)
• explaining that an ALJ’s opinion is given “a commonsensical reading” during an analysis of the opinion for “fatal gaps or contradictions”
• observing that “we give [an ALJ’s] opinion a commonsensical reading rather than nitpicking at it”
• observing that “we give [an ALJ’s] opinion a commonsensical reading rather than nitpicking at it”
• explaining that harmless errors are those that do not ultimately impact the outcome of the determination

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).