Parker v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• finding that “failure to consider the cumulative effect of impairments not totally disabling in themselves was an elementary error”
• finding that “failure to consider the cumulative effect of impairments not totally disabling in themselves was an elementary error”
• explaining that the Chenery doctrine “forbids an agency’s lawyers to defend the agency’s decision on grounds that the agency itself had not embraced”
• finding that “failure to consider the cumulative effect of impairments not totally disabling in themselves was an elementary error”
• noting that the Chenery doctrine forbids an agency’s lawyers from defending the agency’s decision on grounds that the agency itself had not embraced
• stating that “harmless error . . . is applicable to judicial review of administrative decisions”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).