Denton v. Astrue

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an ALJ was entitled to rely on medical experts when no contrary evidence is presented
• holding that ALJ did not err by refusing to consider GAF scores in mental impairment case
• holding that an ALJ “cannot simply cherry-pick facts that support a finding of non-disability while ignoring evidence that points to a disability finding.”
• holding that ALJ properly assessed impact of non-severe depression in noting that the claimant “did not seek out treatment for depression during the period of purported disability”
• holding that ALJs must “consider all relevant medical evidence and cannot simply cherry-pick facts that support a finding of non-disability while ignoring evidence that points to a disability finding.”
• holding that ALJs must “consider all relevant 6 medical evidence and cannot simply cherry-pick facts that support a finding of non-disability while ignoring evidence that points to a disability finding.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).