Joseph A. Zurawski v. William A. Halter, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, .

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating that it is incumbent upon an ALJ to discuss evidence contrary to the Commissioner’s position
• finding that ALJ must explain inconsistencies between activities and allegations
• ALJ’s adverse credibility determination could not be upheld because it was based solely on unsupported “inconsistencies” with medical record and daily activities
• “[T]he ALJ’s analysis must provide some glimpse into the reasoning behind [the] decision to deny benefits.”
• The ALJ is required to explain why unfavorable evidence is more probative/valuable than evidence favorable to Plaintiff’s claim
• “[T]he ALJ’s analysis must provide some glimpse into the reasoning behind [the] decision to deny benefits.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).