Jennifer Moore v. Carolyn Colvin

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that an ALJ can consider evidence of an addiction problem but that he must “explain his rationale for crediting the [addiction] evidence over the contrary evidence”
• holding that “[a] decision that lacks adequate discussion of the issues will be remanded”
• stating that we will consider an ALJ’s opinion to be adequately explained so long as it does not “lack[] adequate discussion of the issues”
• holding that an ALJ may not ignore a contrary line of evidence
• stating that “[t]he ALJ must confront the evidence that does not support her conclusion and explain why that evidence was rejected”
• requiring that the ALJ “confront” evidence that undermines her conclusions and explain why the evidence was rejected

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).