Skip to main content

Armour v. State

Citations

  • 479 N.E.2d 1294
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 881

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • rejecting an objective approach to determining a defendant’s mens rea and holding that a “subjective standard [is] mandated by our culpability defin[ing] statute[s]”
  • “[ajffirmative defenses challenging the validity of predicate felony convictions must be substantiated on the face of the proof offered by the State to establish such convictions”
  • “Miranda does not require an accused be informed of the penal consequences or the specificity of charges.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Debruler, Givan, Prentice, Pi-Varnik, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

43 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

17 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.