Skip to main content

State v. Miranda

Citations

  • 274 Conn. 727
  • 878 A.2d 1118
  • 2005 Conn. LEXIS 291

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • noting that under aggregate package theory, “we must vacate a sentence in its entirety when we invalidate any part of the total sentence”
  • overruling this court's prior interpretation of General Statutes § 53a-59 [a] [3]
  • ‘‘there are occasions when the goals of stare decisis are outweighed by the need to overturn a previous decision in the interest of reaching a just conclusion in a matter’’
  • \there are occasions when the goals of stare decisis are outweighed by the need to overturn a previous decision in the interest of reaching a just conclusion in a matter\
  • \[i]t is more important that the court should be right upon later and more elaborate consideration of the cases than consistent with previous declarations\ [internal quotation marks omitted]
  • court corrected \clearly wrong\ statutory interpretation only three years old

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Borden, Katz, Norcott, Palmer, Sullivan, Vertefeuille, Whom, Zarella

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

29 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

95 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.