Indiana Supreme Court· 3/21/1985
Cox v. State
Citations
- 475 N.E.2d 664
- 1985 Ind. LEXIS 775
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating that criminal defendant has duty to provide proper record to facilitate intelligent appellate review of issues
- noting that a criminal defendant has a duty to provide a proper record for appeal so that an intelligent review of the issues may 5 be made
- where criminal defense lawyer’s testimony in client’s behalf would be merely cumulative, lawyer’s failure to withdraw was not ineffective assistance; cumulative testimony does not make it ‘obvious’ that lawyer should withdraw and testify
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Givan
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- People v. BurrowsIllinois Supreme Court· 1992-03-26· cited 94×
- Wilson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-07-17· cited 83×
- Harris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-30· cited 83×
- Hampton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 2012-02-14· cited 80×
- Davidson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1990-08-29· cited 78×
- Kindred v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-06-08· cited 67×
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1998-06-26· cited 62×
- Whittle v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-08-31· cited 61×
- Coates v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-03-08· cited 60×
- Mahla v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-08-20· cited 56×
- Armour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-03· cited 50×
- Clemens v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1993-03-11· cited 47×
- City of Bloomington v. KuruzovichIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-12-28· cited 45×
- Perigo v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-08-04· cited 38×
- Kirby v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-08-29· cited 37×
- State v. AlcornIndiana Supreme Court· 1994-08-12· cited 32×
- LeaseAmerica Corp. v. StewartCourt of Appeals of Kansas· 1994-06-17· cited 25×
- Hudson v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1986-09-03· cited 23×
- Linger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1987-06-01· cited 20×
- Mid-West Federal Savings Bank v. EppersonIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-10-03· cited 20×
Cites
32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Strickland v. WashingtonSupreme Court· 1984-06-25· cited 123,578×
- Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court· 1968-06-03· cited 4,818×
- Bordenkircher v. HayesSupreme Court· 1978-03-06· cited 2,683×
- Blackledge v. PerrySupreme Court· 1974-05-20· cited 1,945×
- Adams v. TexasSupreme Court· 1980-06-25· cited 1,718×
- United States v. GoodwinSupreme Court· 1982-06-18· cited 1,581×
- Burris v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-06-29· cited 127×
- Grey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-05-29· cited 105×
- Rowan v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1982-03-05· cited 101×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-07-06· cited 82×
- Akins v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-22· cited 76×
- Richey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-10-06· cited 75×
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-04-30· cited 70×
- Beavers v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1957-03-26· cited 61×
- Cherry v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-01-07· cited 60×
- Summerlot v. SummerlotIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-08-20· cited 56×
- Elliott v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-07-12· cited 54×
- Underhill v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1981-12-03· cited 50×
- Spears v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-02-27· cited 48×
- Reynolds v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1984-03-14· cited 47×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.