Skip to main content

Cox v. State

Citations

  • 475 N.E.2d 664
  • 1985 Ind. LEXIS 775

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • stating that criminal defendant has duty to provide proper record to facilitate intelligent appellate review of issues
  • noting that a criminal defendant has a duty to provide a proper record for appeal so that an intelligent review of the issues may 5 be made
  • where criminal defense lawyer’s testimony in client’s behalf would be merely cumulative, lawyer’s failure to withdraw was not ineffective assistance; cumulative testimony does not make it ‘obvious’ that lawyer should withdraw and testify

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Givan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

50 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

32 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.