Indiana Court of Appeals· 12/10/1990
Mallory v. State
Citations
- 563 N.E.2d 640
- 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1610
- 1990 WL 201414
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that knowingly or intentionally “depriv[ing] the dependent of necessary support” includes actively depriving dependent of necessary medical treatment
- upholding the trial court’s reasonable consideration that neglect of an extremely young child is worse that the same neglect directed towards an older dependent
- stating the challenger \is not at liberty to devise a hypothetical situation which might demonstrate vagueness\ and a \statute is void for vagueness only if it is vague as applied to the precise circumstances of this case\
- stating the challenger “is not at liberty to devise a hypothetical situation which might demonstrate vagueness” and a “statute is void for vagueness only if it is vague as applied to the precise circumstances of this case”
- doctor testified child’s injuries were treatable and child “could have” survived with prompt medical attention
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Robertson, Ratliff, Miller
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Baumgartner v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-08-15· cited 143×
- Brown v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2002-01-07· cited 120×
- Helton v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1993-12-01· cited 54×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-11-13· cited 39×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-04-27· cited 38×
- Vaillancourt v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-05-22· cited 30×
- Steelman v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-10-28· cited 26×
- John Doe v. Adam GraySeventh Circuit· 2023-07-28· cited 23×
- Lush v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2003-02-25· cited 22×
- Christopher Smith v. State of IndianaIndiana Supreme Court· 2014-03-27· cited 19×
- Kile v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2000-05-26· cited 16×
- Boss v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1998-12-11· cited 13×
- Gilliam v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-04-27· cited 13×
- Houston v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2008-12-16· cited 12×
- Ricketts v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1992-08-31· cited 12×
- Kerlin v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1991-06-12· cited 10×
- Wurster v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1999-03-29· cited 10×
- Purvi Patel v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals· 2016-07-22· cited 10×
- Guidry v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1995-04-28· cited 9×
- Edwards v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 2006-02-21· cited 8×
Cites
15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Alfaro v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-05-28· cited 145×
- Royal Crown Cola Co. v. Coca-Cola Co.Supreme Court· 1990-06-25· cited 98×
- State v. DowneyIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-04-11· cited 82×
- Huffman v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-09-07· cited 72×
- Stanger v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-11-06· cited 55×
- Davis v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1985-03-28· cited 53×
- Armour v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1985-07-03· cited 50×
- Bailey v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1980-11-06· cited 42×
- Smith v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1980-08-19· cited 36×
- Jones v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1983-06-14· cited 24×
- Hill v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-03-13· cited 23×
- Nichols v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals· 1989-08-23· cited 12×
- Rozika v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1988-04-06· cited 11×
- Short v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-06-16· cited 9×
- Lamphier v. StateIndiana Supreme Court· 1989-02-23· cited 6×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.