Skip to main content

Mallory v. State

Citations

  • 563 N.E.2d 640
  • 1990 Ind. App. LEXIS 1610
  • 1990 WL 201414

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • explaining that knowingly or intentionally “depriv[ing] the dependent of necessary support” includes actively depriving dependent of necessary medical treatment
  • upholding the trial court’s reasonable consideration that neglect of an extremely young child is worse that the same neglect directed towards an older dependent
  • stating the challenger \is not at liberty to devise a hypothetical situation which might demonstrate vagueness\ and a \statute is void for vagueness only if it is vague as applied to the precise circumstances of this case\
  • stating the challenger “is not at liberty to devise a hypothetical situation which might demonstrate vagueness” and a “statute is void for vagueness only if it is vague as applied to the precise circumstances of this case”
  • doctor testified child’s injuries were treatable and child “could have” survived with prompt medical attention

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Robertson, Ratliff, Miller

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

34 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

15 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.