Skip to main content

Haynes v. State

Citations

  • 431 N.E.2d 83
  • 1982 Ind. LEXIS 737

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that officer’s search of confidential informant before controlled buy, observation of informant entering and leaving controlled buy area, and informants return with drugs were sufficient to sustain conviction
  • “The fact that the informant was not actually seen entering the house was a factor for the jury to consider in weighing the evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Pivarnik, Givan, Debruler, Prentice, Hunter

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

22 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.