Allen v. Administrative Review Bd.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that “an employee’s reasonable belief must be scrutinized under both a subjective and objective standard”
• holding that Burlington Northern applies to SOX
• “We agree that an employee’s reasonable belief must be scrutinized under both a subjective and objective standard.”
• “To prevail [in a Sarbanes-Oxley whistleblower retaliation action], an employee must prove by a preponderance of the evidence that (1) [he] engaged in protected activity; (2) the employer knew that she engaged in the protected activity . . . .”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).