· 5/28/2015
Michael Rhinehimer v. U.S. Bancorp Investments, Inc.
Citations
- 787 F.3d 797
- 2015 FED App. 0102P
- 40 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 137
- 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 8803
- 99 Empl. Prac. Dec. (CCH) 45,317
- 2015 WL 3404658
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- applying Skidmore deference and noting that the purpose of the whistleblower statute “turns on employees’ reasonable belief rather than requiring them to ultimately substantiate their allegations”
- “The evidence should not be weighed, and the credibility of the witnesses should not be questioned. The judgment of [the] court should not be substituted for that of the jury.”
- “[T]he reasonableness of the employee’s belief will depend on the totality of the circumstances known (or reasonably albeit mistakenly perceived) by the employee at the time of the complaint, analyzed in light of the employee’s training and experience.” (emphasis added)
- internal 2 These enumerated provisions include: (1
- adopting Sylvester applying Skidmore deference
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Daughtrey, Moore, Clay
Read full opinion on CourtListenerSourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.