Frederick R. Marano v. Department of Justice

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• explaining that the WPA requires 10 “evidence only that [a whistleblower’s] protected disclosure played a role in, or was ‘a contributing factor’ to, the personnel action taken”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).