Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 1/12/2005

Barrie v. Intervoice-Brite, Inc.

Citations

  • 397 F.3d 249
  • 60 Fed. R. Serv. 3d 811
  • 2005 U.S. App. LEXIS 500
  • 2005 WL 57928

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that plaintiff pleaded a material misstatement by alleging with particularity that defendants violated GAAP
  • noting that “the normal procedure where the lower court has not considered a pertinent issue is to remand a case”
  • upholding dismissal when plaintiff attributed statements to “management,” but not individuals
  • upholding dismissal when plaintiff attributed statements to “management,” but not individuals
  • “Moreover, the allegations of knowledge and severe recklessness must be considered in conjunction with the defendants’ bonuses and stock sales profits.”
  • “While [the Fifth Circuit] will view a complaint in totó when considering whether a complaint has adequately pled scienter, each allegation of fraud must individually meet the particularity requirements of the PSLRA.” (internal citation omitted)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Benavides, Clement, Dennis

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

40 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

12 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Barrie v. Intervoice-Brite, Inc.

2 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.