Halliburton, Inc. v. Administrative Review Board

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that “the statute affords noneconomic compensatory damages, including emotional distress and reputational harm”
• holding that retaliatory intent is not an element of a section 1514A claim
• acknowledging that the relevant issue was whether the disclosure of the complaining employee’s identity “in the surrounding circumstances amounted to a ‘materially adverse’ action under Burlington” (emphasis added)
• noting that we are “hesitant to create a circuit split absent a persuasive justification”
• where employer’s targeted creation of an environment where the plaintiff was ostracized amounted to adverse employment action
• “[W]e think Congress meant what it said. ‘All means all.’”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).