D.C. Circuit· 8/13/2010
Aliotta v. Bair
Citations
- 614 F.3d 556
- 392 U.S. App. D.C. 239
- 2010 U.S. App. LEXIS 16763
- 109 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 1701
- 2010 WL 3190828
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- claims raised in complaint may be abandoned at summary judgment
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Sentelle, Ginsburg, Brown
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
95 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Peters v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2012-04-16· cited 127×
- Ford v. MabusD.C. Circuit· 2010-12-10· cited 96×
- Townsend v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2017-02-21· cited 69×
- David DeJesus v. WP Company LLCD.C. Circuit· 2016-11-15· cited 66×
- Elzeneiny v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-08-19· cited 64×
- Mason v. GeithnerDistrict of Columbia· 2011-09-12· cited 55×
- Burton v. District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2015-10-09· cited 37×
- Doak v. NapolitanoDistrict of Columbia· 2014-02-10· cited 35×
- Jones v. CastroDistrict of Columbia· 2016-02-29· cited 32×
- Warner v. Vance-CooksDistrict of Columbia· 2013-07-25· cited 31×
- Richardson v. PetasisDistrict of Columbia· 2015-12-07· cited 29×
- Kittner v. GatesDistrict of Columbia· 2011-05-11· cited 28×
- Davis v. Dist. of ColumbiaD.C. Circuit· 2019-06-07· cited 27×
- Jefferson v. HarrisDistrict of Columbia· 2016-03-21· cited 22×
- Hornsby v. WattDistrict of Columbia· 2016-11-04· cited 22×
- Smith v. HolderDistrict of Columbia· 2015-07-15· cited 20×
- Jane DiCocco v. Merrick GarlandFourth Circuit· 2022-11-03· cited 19×
- Anderson v. SpellingsDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-30· cited 18×
- Joyce v. Office of the Architect of the CapitolDistrict of Columbia· 2013-09-05· cited 18×
- Christina Williams v. Robert JohnsonD.C. Circuit· 2015-01-16· cited 18×
Cites
36 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- International Brotherhood of Teamsters v. United StatesSupreme Court· 1977-05-31· cited 4,895×
- United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court· 1983-04-04· cited 2,660×
- Hazen Paper Co. v. BigginsSupreme Court· 1993-04-20· cited 1,653×
- Brady v. Office of the Sergeant at ArmsD.C. Circuit· 2008-03-28· cited 1,336×
- Baloch v. KempthorneD.C. Circuit· 2008-12-30· cited 1,027×
- Jones v. BernankeD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-06· cited 725×
- Smith v. City of JacksonSupreme Court· 2005-03-30· cited 580×
- Douglas v. DonovanD.C. Circuit· 2009-03-17· cited 361×
- Henry W. Segar v. William French Smith, Attorney General, Henry W. Segar, Cross-Appellants v. William French Smith, Attorney GeneralD.C. Circuit· 1984-06-26· cited 275×
- Jorge VEGA and Eusebio Leon, Plaintiffs, Appellants, v. KODAK CARIBBEAN, LTD., Defendant, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1993-08-24· cited 227×
- Robert R. Henn v. National Geographic SocietySeventh Circuit· 1987-07-02· cited 215×
- John Edmond v. United States Postal Service General CounselD.C. Circuit· 1992-02-11· cited 189×
- Krodel v. YoungD.C. Circuit· 1984-11-20· cited 149×
- Veitch, D. Philip v. England, Gordon R.D.C. Circuit· 2006-11-28· cited 141×
- Norman E. Rowell v. BellSouth CorporationEleventh Circuit· 2005-12-20· cited 137×
- Unnamed caseEighth Circuit· 1994-11-22· cited 133×
- Alison Palmer v. George P. Shultz, as Secretary of State. Marguerite Cooper v. George P. Shultz, as Secretary of StateD.C. Circuit· 1987-03-24· cited 131×
- Barnette, Margaret v. Chertoff, MichaelD.C. Circuit· 2006-07-07· cited 122×
- James v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Tenth Circuit· 1994-04-11· cited 110×
Other cases named Aliotta v. Bair
2 other CourtListener records share this case name.
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.