District of Columbia· 7/15/2015
Smith v. Holder
Citations
- 115 F. Supp. 3d 5
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- explaining that the clear error standard is “a very exacting standard” which contemplates only those mistakes that are “dead wrong” (first quoting Bond v. U.S. Dep’t of Just., 286 F.R.D. 16, 22 (D.D.C. 2012
- “[T]o be clearly erroneous, a decision must strike [a court] as more than just maybe or probably wrong; it must . . . strike [the court] as wrong with the force of a five-week-old, unrefrigerated dead fish.’” (quoting Parts & Elec. Motors, 866 F.2d at 233
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Judge Beryl A. Howell
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Holmes v. University of the District of ColumbiaDistrict of Columbia· 2017-03-23· cited 3×
- Segal v. Harris Teeter Supermarkets, Inc.District of Columbia· 2016-12-13
- United States v. VillongcoDistrict of Columbia· 2017-06-13
- Easaw v. NewportDistrict of Columbia· 2018-10-15
- United States v. BurwellDistrict of Columbia· 2021-06-10
- Black v. GuzmanDistrict of Columbia· 2023-04-24
- Feloni v. MayorkasDistrict of Columbia· 2023-05-01
- Pfeiffer v. United States Department of EnergyDistrict of Columbia· 2023-07-07
- United States v. MaloneDistrict of Columbia· 2023-09-08
- Bergdahl v. United StatesDistrict of Columbia· 2024-05-23
- Morsell v. Symantec CorporationDistrict of Columbia· 2024-08-30
Cites
45 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court· 1973-05-14· cited 38,518×
- Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court· 2000-06-12· cited 12,455×
- Burlington Northern & Santa Fe Railway Co. v. WhiteSupreme Court· 2006-06-22· cited 7,269×
- National Railroad Passenger Corporation v. MorganSupreme Court· 2002-06-10· cited 6,600×
- Tolan v. CottonSupreme Court· 2014-05-05· cited 4,257×
- Associated General Contractors of California, Inc. v. California State Council of CarpentersSupreme Court· 1983-02-22· cited 3,116×
- Exxon Shipping Co. v. BakerSupreme Court· 2008-06-25· cited 1,413×
- Toyota Motor Manufacturing, Kentucky, Inc. v. WilliamsSupreme Court· 2002-01-08· cited 1,389×
- Myrna O'Dell Firestone v. Leonard K. FirestoneD.C. Circuit· 1996-02-16· cited 1,378×
- Hutchinson v. StatonFourth Circuit· 1993-05-24· cited 500×
- Magloire Etoh v. Fannie MaeD.C. Circuit· 2013-04-05· cited 286×
- Henry W. Segar v. William French Smith, Attorney General, Henry W. Segar, Cross-Appellants v. William French Smith, Attorney GeneralD.C. Circuit· 1984-06-26· cited 275×
- Sarah Kattan, by Her Parents and Next Friends Susan J. Thomas and Joseph Kattan, and Cross-Appellants v. District of Columbia, and Cross-AppelleesD.C. Circuit· 1993-10-06· cited 272×
- Anyanwutaku, K. v. Moore, MargaretD.C. Circuit· 1998-07-24· cited 224×
- United States of America, Ex Rel. Martin Becker v. Westinghouse Savannah River CompanyFourth Circuit· 2002-09-27· cited 223×
- Greer v. PaulsonD.C. Circuit· 2007-11-02· cited 222×
- Gleklen v. Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee, Inc.D.C. Circuit· 2000-01-11· cited 215×
- Parts and Electric Motors, Inc., an Illinois Corporation v. Sterling Electric, Inc., a Delaware CorporationSeventh Circuit· 1989-03-09· cited 178×
- Messina, Karyn v. Krakower, DanielD.C. Circuit· 2006-03-07· cited 171×
- Rhonda Baird v. Joshua GotbaumD.C. Circuit· 2015-07-07· cited 170×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.