Anderson v. Spellings

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding disparate-impact claims are not cognizable under § 633a(a)
• “Disagreeing with the Court’s 21 later narrowing of employer liability in Wards Cove . . . Congress codified a modified version of the [business necessity] defense into Title VII in 1991.”
• “preference for central oversight and reduced cost” was a legitimate business necessity even if plaintiffs preferred a different decision

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).