California Court of Appeal· 12/13/2002
Alexander v. Codemasters Group Limited
Citations
- 127 Cal. Rptr. 2d 145
- 104 Cal. App. 4th 129
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- stating “[mjutual consent is determined under an objective standard applied to outward manifestations or expressions of the parties, i.e., the reasonable meaning of their words and acts .... ”
- “[T]he phrase appears ambiguous on the record before us and, as such, presents a question to be resolved by the trier of fact.”
- “[Ijf the terms of a contract are ambiguous, determining the contract’s terms is a question of fact for the trier of fact, based on ‘all credible evidence concerning the parties’ intentions.’ ”
- “mutual assent is determined 5 under an objective standard applied to the outward manifestations or expressions of the 6 parties, i.e., the reasonable meaning of their words and acts, and not their unexpressed 7 intentions or understandings.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Gomes
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
47 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Reid v. Google, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2010-08-05· cited 657×
- Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-12-20· cited 237×
- ASP Properties Group, L.P. v. Fard, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-10-05· cited 148×
- Bustamante v. Intuit, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2006-07-10· cited 137×
- DiCola v. White Brothers Performance Products, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2008-01-02· cited 132×
- Serafin v. Balco Properties Ltd., LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-03-16· cited 127×
- Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-10· cited 126×
- Chicago Title Insurance v. AMZ Insurance Services, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2010-09-09· cited 81×
- Smith v. Adventist Health System/WestCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-03-04· cited 76×
- Coburn v. SievertCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2005-11-10· cited 73×
- Quantification Settlement Agreement CasesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-12-07· cited 73×
- Lattimore v. DickeyCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2015-08-21· cited 69×
- Garcia v. World Savings, FSBCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-04-09· cited 68×
- Roe v. McDonald's Corp.California Court of Appeal· 2005-05-27· cited 68×
- Harris v. TAP Worldwide, LLCCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2016-06-22· cited 66×
- Scalf v. D. B. Log Homes, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2005-05-05· cited 63×
- Truong v. GlasserCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-12-29· cited 62×
- Habitat Trust for Wildlife, Inc. v. City of Rancho CucamongaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-07-21· cited 57×
- Donohue v. Apple, Inc.N.D. California· 2012-05-10· cited 53×
- Smyth v. BermanCalifornia Court of Appeals, 5th District· 2019-01-10· cited 52×
Cites
24 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.California Supreme Court· 2001-07-11· cited 2,941×
- Guz v. Bechtel National, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-10-05· cited 1,654×
- Merrill v. Navegar, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2001-08-06· cited 637×
- Ann M. v. Pacific Plaza Shopping CenterCalifornia Supreme Court· 1993-12-16· cited 411×
- Winet v. PriceCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1992-03-23· cited 353×
- Santopietro v. City of New HavenSupreme Court of Connecticut· 1996-08-27· cited 203×
- Augeri v. C. F. Wooding Co.Supreme Court of Connecticut· 1977-08-30· cited 120×
- Snukal v. Flightways Manufacturing, Inc.California Supreme Court· 2000-07-17· cited 112×
- Walker v. Countrywide Home Loans, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 2002-05-30· cited 104×
- Roussalis v. Wyoming Medical Center, Inc.Wyoming Supreme Court· 2000-04-20· cited 84×
- Laird v. Capital Cities/ABC, Inc.California Court of Appeal· 1998-12-15· cited 75×
- Lopez v. BacaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2002-06-05· cited 72×
- Biljac Associates v. First Interstate Bank of OregonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1990-03-22· cited 57×
- Sambrano v. City of San DiegoCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2001-12-06· cited 57×
- Frankel v. Board of Dental ExaminersCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1996-06-17· cited 54×
- Ronin v. LernerTex. App. Ct., 1st Dist. (Houston)· 1999-12-23· cited 50×
- Peterson Development Co. v. Torrey Pines BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1991-08-09· cited 50×
- Haskell v. CarliCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1987-09-29· cited 41×
- Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. StoneCalifornia Court of Appeal· 1973-11-16· cited 40×
- City of Long Beach v. Farmers & Merchants BankCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2000-06-19· cited 30×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.