Alexander v. Codemasters Group Limited

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• stating “[mjutual consent is determined under an objective standard applied to outward manifestations or expressions of the parties, i.e., the reasonable meaning of their words and acts .... ”
• “[T]he phrase appears ambiguous on the record before us and, as such, presents a question to be resolved by the trier of fact.”
• “[Ijf the terms of a contract are ambiguous, determining the contract’s terms is a question of fact for the trier of fact, based on ‘all credible evidence concerning the parties’ intentions.’ ”
• “mutual assent is determined 5 under an objective standard applied to the outward manifestations or expressions of the 6 parties, i.e., the reasonable meaning of their words and acts, and not their unexpressed 7 intentions or understandings.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).