Aguilar v. Atlantic Richfield Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• recognizing in this context that inference of unlawful conspiracy required by Matsushita “is reasonable if, and only if, it implies unlawful conspiracy more likely than permissible competition
• adopting the Matsushita standard and making it applicable to claims under the Cartwright Act
• describing the “burden of production” in the summary judgment context as requiring the moving party to “make a prima facie showing of the nonexistence of any triable issue of material fact”
• on summary 10 judgment a court “does not decide on any finding of its own, but 11 simply decides what finding such a trier of fact could make for 12 itself.”
• on summary 21 judgment a court “does not decide on any finding of its own, but 22 simply decides what finding such a trier of fact could make for 23 itself.”
• on summary 10 judgment a court “does not decide on any finding of its own, but 11 simply decides what finding such a trier of fact could make for 12 itself.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).