Skip to main content
· 6/17/1996

Frankel v. Board of Dental Examiners

Citations

  • 46 Cal. App. 4th 534
  • 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 128
  • 96 Daily Journal DAR 6982
  • 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 4365
  • 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 573
  • 1996 WL 329524

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that a contract is not illusory when the power to withdraw from the contract must be exercised in good faith
  • defining “authorization” as “givfing] official permission for (something) to happen, or ... giving (someone) official permission (to do something)”
  • “Conditions precedent are not favored in the law ..., and courts shall not construe a term of the contract so as to establish a condition precedent absent plain and unambiguous contract language to that effect.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Scotland

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.