Skip to main content
· 12/20/2005

Stewart v. Preston Pipeline Inc.

Citations

  • 36 Cal. Rptr. 3d 901
  • 134 Cal. App. 4th 1565
  • 2005 Daily Journal DAR 14681
  • 2005 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 10743
  • 2005 Cal. App. LEXIS 1947

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • “mutual assent to a contract is based upon objective and outward manifestations of the parties”
  • “Mutual assent to contract is based upon objective and outward manifestations of the 12 parties; a party's ‘subjective intent, or subjective consent, therefore is irrelevant.’”
  • plaintiff’s failure to read settlement agreement prior to signature constituted 15 plaintiff bearing risk of such mistake, precluding rescission
  • “ [A] party ordinarily may not obtain relief based up on unilateral mistake where he or she has failed to read the contract before signing it. ”
  • settlement has lawful object insofar 7 as it resolves litigation
  • “It is well established, in the absence of fraud, overreaching CUENNTITREADL S DTIASTTERSIC DTI SOTFR CICATL ICFOOURRNTIA CIVIL MINUTES - GENERAL Case No. SACV 19-2436 JVS (DFMx) Date March 26, 2020 Title Pamela Ko v. The Anthem Companies, Inc. et al quotation marks omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Duffy

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.