Skip to main content
· 12/23/1999

Ronin v. Lerner

Citations

  • 7 S.W.3d 883
  • 1999 Tex. App. LEXIS 9468
  • 1999 WL 1240945

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that details of indemnity terms were not essential to settlement agreement
  • holding that details of indemnity terms were not essential to settlement agreement
  • observing that, in response to trial court’s inquiry, party stated his agreement to terms of settlement dictated into record, and considering lack of statement on record that Rule 11 agreement was only preliminary factor in enforcing agreement
  • observing that, in response to trial court’s inquiry, party stated his agreement to terms of settlement dictated into record, and considering lack of statement on record that Rule 11 agreement was only preliminary factor in enforcing agreement
  • holding terms of indemnity were not essential terms
  • enforceability of settlement agreement is question of law

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Schneider, Andell, Duggan

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.