Bustamante v. Intuit, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• requiring “sufficiently definite” terms for 11 USCA4 Appeal: 24-1054 Doc: 45 Filed: 04/23/2025 Pg: 12 of 18 enforceability under California law
• “Where a contract is so uncertain and indefinite that the intention of the parties in material particulars cannot be ascertained, the contract is void and unenforceable.”
• first quoting Ladas v. Cal. State Auto. Ass’n., 23 Cal. Rptr. 2d 810, 814–15 (Cal. Ct. App. 1993); then citing Robinson & Wilson, Inc. v. Stone, 35 Cal. App. 3d 396, 407 (1973)

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).