Faust v. California Portland Cement Co.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “requesting a medical leave of absence . . . is not protected under § 12940” for a 3 FEHA retaliation claim
• determining summary judgment was precluded where employee did not take full leave before he was fired and was not provided notice of his rights
• applying the test established in McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. Green , 411 U.S. 792 , 802, 93 S.Ct. 1817 , 36 L.Ed.2d 668 (1973)
• applying ADA case law to claim of disability discrimination under FEHA
• requiring a Plaintiff establish the following for a FEHA claim: “(1) he suffers from a disability; (2) he is otherwise qualified to do his job; and, (3) he was subjected to adverse employment action because of his disability”
• requiring a Plaintiff establish the following for a FEHA claim: “(1) [she] suffers from a disability; (2) [she] is otherwise qualified to do [her] job; and, (3) [she] was subjected to adverse employment action because of [her] disability”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).