Federal Claims· 7/28/2006

Agee v. United States

Citations

72 Fed. Cl. 284
2006 U.S. Claims LEXIS 221
2006 WL 2130511

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

concluding that the COFC does not have jurisdiction over claims arising under Title II of the ADA
dismissing plaintiff’s “claims concerning violations of HIPAA because the statute does not provide for a private right of action against the [f]ederal [g]overnment.”
“[T]his court lacks jurisdiction to consider whether the United States District Court [ ] abused its discretion....”
“Congress has not waived the Federal Government's sovereign immunity with regard to ADA claims”
“[I]t is apparent that no private right of action exists under the Act.”
“The United States is not liable for the actions of non-federal parties who are not agents of the United States.” (citing Brazos Elec. Power Coop. v. U.S. Dep’t of Agric., 144 F.3d 784, 787 (Fed.Cir.1998))

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Williams

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

55 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

37 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases named Agee v. United States

8 other CourtListener records share this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.