Cycenas v. United States

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the Court ofFederal Claims \lacks jurisdiction to review plaintiff s . . . claims that sound in tort or allege criminal conduct\ and citing cases
• holding identity theft is a criminal law claim and outside of the court’s jurisdiction
• dismissing claim against private individuals who allegedly made fraudulent misrepresentations in the plaintiff’s bankruptcy proceeding
• explaining that trespass claims sound in tort
• “[T]he Tucker Act excludes from the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction claims sounding in tort.”
• “[T]he Tucker Act excludes from the Court of Federal Claims jurisdiction claims sounding in tort.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).