Skip to main content
Fifth Circuit· 11/13/2006

Acara v. Banks

Citations

  • 470 F.3d 569
  • 2006 U.S. App. LEXIS 28120
  • 2006 WL 3262444

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that Congress did not intend for a private right of action under HIPAA
  • finding that Congress intended that HIPAA be enforced only by the Secretary of Health and Human Services
  • noting that “[e]very district court that has considered this issue is in agreement that [HIPAA] does not support a private right of action”
  • concluding Congress did not intend for private enforcement of HIPAA
  • holding “there is no private cause of action under HIPAA”
  • affirming motion to dismiss plaintiff’s suit against doctor for violating HIPAA by disclosing her medical information without consent and holding that “there is no private cause of action under HIPAA”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Demoss, Stewart, Prado

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

56 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

13 cases in this archive are cited by this case.

Other cases named Acara v. Banks

1 other CourtListener record shares this case name.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.