Massachusetts Appeals Court· 10/3/2001
Adamczyk v. Augat, Inc.
Citations
- 52 Mass. App. Ct. 717
- 755 N.E.2d 824
- 2001 Mass. App. LEXIS 928
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- concluding that the limitations period commenced on the date plaintiffs were notified that their employment would be terminated, not on the actual termination date
- holding that there could be no genuine issue as to the date of the alleged discriminatory act or as to the employees’ cognizance of their prospective termination dates because they received more than one unequivocal notice of termination
- noting, with respect to claim of unlawful discrimination under Chapter 151B, that “[c]ourts apply the principle of equitable tolling sparingly in employment discrimination cases”
- statute of limitations not equitably tolled where defendant made no affirmatively misleading statements to lull plaintiffs into not asserting claims
- statute of limitations on discriminatory discharge claims begins to run when plaintiff notified of termination, not when actual separation from employment occurs
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Greenberg
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
9 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Abraham v. Woods Hole Oceanographic InstituteFirst Circuit· 2009-01-22· cited 93×
- Shervin v. Partners Healthcare System, Inc.First Circuit· 2015-10-09· cited 64×
- Halstrom v. DubeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 2019-02-15· cited 24×
- Svensson v. Putnam Investments LLCD. Massachusetts· 2008-04-09· cited 6×
- Soltys v. Wellesley Country ClubMassachusetts Superior Court· 2002-10-28· cited 1×
- Brienzo v. Town of AcushnetMassachusetts Superior Court· 2002-08-27
- Murray v. Framingham Country ClubMassachusetts Superior Court· 2005-06-20
- Martin-Kirkland v. United Parcel Service, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2006-04-11
- Susan Miele v. Foundation Medicine, Inc.Massachusetts Superior Court· 2026-03-30
Cites
19 cases in this archive are cited by this case.
- Delaware State College v. RicksSupreme Court· 1980-12-15· cited 2,132×
- Morris v. Government Development BankFirst Circuit· 1994-06-29· cited 468×
- Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of America, Carl Kale v. Combined Insurance Company of AmericaFirst Circuit· 1988-11-17· cited 200×
- Donald A. JENSEN, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. Anthony M. FRANK, Postmaster General, United States Postal Service, Defendant, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1990-08-27· cited 195×
- Green v. Wyman-Gordon Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-05-03· cited 178×
- Charland v. Muzi Motors, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-04-21· cited 175×
- Harold R. PRICE, Appellant, v. LITTON BUSINESS SYSTEMS, INC., AppelleeFourth Circuit· 1982-12-09· cited 158×
- Johnny Watson v. Eastman Kodak CompanyThird Circuit· 2000-12-21· cited 153×
- Jakob UNTERREINER, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. VOLKSWAGEN OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED, Defendant-AppelleeSeventh Circuit· 1993-12-15· cited 139×
- Wheatley v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1994-07-19· cited 132×
- William E. Wilson v. Westinghouse Electric CorporationEighth Circuit· 1988-02-01· cited 117×
- Williams v. Raytheon Co.First Circuit· 2000-07-21· cited 91×
- Joseph A. STURNIOLO, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHEAFFER, EATON, INC., and Anthony C. Barry, Defendants-AppelleesEleventh Circuit· 1994-03-07· cited 70×
- Garland E. CHING, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MITRE CORPORATION, Defendant, AppelleeFirst Circuit· 1990-12-10· cited 65×
- Wagner v. Sperry Univac, Division of Sperry Rand Corp.E.D. Pennsylvania· 1978-09-06· cited 58×
- Myrle B. Cooper v. St. Cloud State University, a Minnesota State UniversityEighth Circuit· 2000-09-25· cited 45×
- Andrews v. Arkwright Mutual InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-12-05· cited 40×
- School Committee v. Massachusetts Commission Against DiscriminationMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1996-06-19· cited 35×
- Shafnacker v. Raymond James & Associates, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court· 1997-08-14· cited 33×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.