Charland v. Muzi Motors, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• adopting the analysis and conclusion of Melley v. Gillette Corp., 19 Mass.App.Ct. 511, 513, 475 N.E.2d 1227 (1985)
• discussing and distinguishing O’Connell and Comey on the foregoing bases in context of finding that chapter 151B bars alternate remedy under chapter 93
• dismissing an implied covenant claim alleging sex discrimination because of Chapter 151B's exclusivity provision
• noting \legislative intent to subject all discrimination claims to administrative scrutiny\
• noting “legislative intent to subject all discrimination claims to administrative scrutiny”
• \a statute is to be interpreted in harmony with prior enactments to give rise to a consistent body of law\

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).