Morris v. Government Development Bank

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the initial termination letter, not subsequent communications, marked beginning of limitations period
• holding that the initial termination letter, not subsequent communications, marked beginning of limitations period
• holding that the initial termination letter, not subsequent communications, marked beginning of limitations period
• rejecting argument that a discrimination claim did not accrue until he knew of both the act and the discriminatory animus as contrary to a “well established” rule that limitations periods “start to run when the employer’s decision is made and communicated to the affected employee”
• “It is by now well established that, in employment discrimination actions, limitations periods normally start to run when the employer’s decision is made and communicated to the affected employee”
• Parenthetical information and emphasis in original, internal citations omitted

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).