Garland E. CHING, Plaintiff, Appellant, v. MITRE CORPORATION, Defendant, Appellee

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that an amendment to a complaint after removal designed to eliminate federal jurisdiction is inconsequential to the court’s determination as to whether the action was properly removed
• limitations period began to run when employee learned of his employer's decision to discharge him and not later when he received formal notice
• cause of action accrues on the happening of an event likely to put plaintiff on notice
• cause of action accrues on the happening of an event likely to put plaintiff on notice
• cause of action accrues on the happening of an event likely to put plaintiff on notice
• “[i]t is immaterial that, in retrospect, appellant views his ADEA claim as surplus”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).