WPP Luxembourg Gamma Three Sarl v. Spot Runner, Inc.

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding Federal Rule 54(b) permits setting aside prior Federal Rule 12(b)(6) dismissal of fraud claim if subsequently discovered evidence shows defendants participated in fraud
• applying the noscitur a sociis canon to the interpretation of a contract
• applying the noscitur a sociis canon to the interpretation of 13 a contract
• “District courts have broad discretion in deciding ... whether to dismiss actions with or without prejudice.”
• “A defendant may only be liable as part of a fraudulent scheme based upon misrepresentations and omissions under Rules 10b-5(a) or (c) when the scheme also encompasses conduct beyond those misrepresentations or omissions.”
• “A defendant may only be liable as part of a fraudulent scheme based upon misrepresentations and omissions under Rules 10b- 5(a) or (c) when the scheme also encompasses conduct beyond those misrepresentations or omissions.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).