Destfino v. Reiswig

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that each 18 defendant is entitled to 30 days to exercise its removal rights after being served
• holding that district court did not err in dismissing complaint for failing to specify which defendants were accused of what conduct
• holding that “each defendant is entitled to thirty days to exercise his removal rights after being served.”
• holding that “‘everyone did everything’ allegations” are insufficient to satisfy federal pleading standards
• holding that dismissal with prejudice was proper because “the district court gave plaintiffs several chances to amend, with detailed instructions as to what they needed to do to fix the problems with their complaint”
• explaining that consent to removal is not required from defendants who were not properly served

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).