Ninth Circuit· 12/11/2008

In Re Digimarc Corp. Derivative Litigation

Citations

549 F.3d 1223
2008 WL 5171347

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

“Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties—each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”
“Diversity jurisdiction 3 requires complete diversity between the parties–each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”
“Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties— each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”
“Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between 7 the parties—each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”
“Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties—each defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”
“Diversity jurisdiction requires complete diversity between the parties—each 20 defendant must be a citizen of a different state from each plaintiff.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: T.G. Nelson, Hawkins, and Jay S. Bybee, Circuit Judges

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

27 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

49 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.