Zevallos v. Obama

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• “The legal consequence of this list is that OFAC’s -designation-challenging procedures for such persons designated, under both the IEEPA and the Kingpin Act, are identical.”
• “The plaintiff’s first argument is moot because OFAC has issued its decision regarding [plaintiff’s] designation.”
• “[T]he D.C. Circuit has suggested that an even more deferential review applies when matters of foreign policy and national security are concerned”
• “All this Court can do is ‘compel agency action . . . unreasonably delayed,’ i.e., compel OFAC to issue a decision — which it has already done.” (emphasis in original)
• relying in part on 8 indictment against designated individual
• noting OFAC’s submission of a lengthy administrative record

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).