Skip to main content
· 7/3/1996

James Madison Limited, by Norman F. Hecht, Sr., Assignee v. Eugene A. Ludwig, Comptroller of the Currency

Citations

  • 82 F.3d 1085
  • 317 U.S. App. D.C. 281

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that issues that appellant argued were disputes of fact precluding summary judgment were issues of law in the context of agency review
  • holding that the court may deny a plaintiff’s motion to amend complaint as futile if the amended complaint would not survive motion to dismiss
  • holding that amendments can be denied where they would not withstand a motion to dismiss
  • noting that courts may supplement the official administrative record compiled by an agency when the agency has “deliberately or negligently excluded documents that may have been adverse to its decision”
  • stating that Court may deny a motion to amend a complaint as futile if the proposed complaint would not survive a motion to dismiss
  • observing that denial of leave to 12 amend is warranted if the proposed claim would not survive a motion to dismiss

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Ginsburg, Per Curiam, Rogers, Tatel

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.