Skip to main content
· 7/10/2015

Zevallos v. Obama Ex Rel. United States

Citations

  • 417 App. D.C. 106
  • 793 F.3d 106
  • 417 U.S. App. D.C. 106
  • 2015 U.S. App. LEXIS 11900
  • 2015 WL 4153882

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • recognizing post-deprivation process may be sufficient “where a State must act quickly”
  • rejecting a due process challenge because plaintiff failed to show how “a faster pace would have changed [the] outcome”
  • dismissing claim under Rule 12(b)(1) when requesting agency to take action it has already taken
  • dismissing claim under Rule 12(b)(1) when requesting agency to take action it has already taken
  • rejecting a due process challenge because plaintiff failed to show how “a faster pace would have changed [the] outcome”
  • finding it “clear that the government may decide to designate an entity based on a broad range of evidence, including intelligence data and hearsay declarations” (quoting Holy Land Found. for Relief & Dev. v. Ashcroft, 333 F.3d 156, 162 (2003

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Griffith, Kavanaugh, Sentelle

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.