Czekalski, Loni v. Peters, Mary

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• concluding that a jury could find adversity where, after a lateral transfer, plaintiff supervised fewer employees and managed a smaller budget
• concluding that a jury could find adversity where, after a lateral transfer, plaintiff supervised fewer employees and managed a smaller budget
• holding that, on summary judgment, the Court must “eschew . . . weighing the evidence”
• holding that courts considering summary judgment must “eschew making credibility determinations or weighing the evidence”
• holding that a court must “eschew making credibility determinations or weighing the evidence” in resolving a motion for summary judgment
• holding that dispute of fact existed as to whether lateral transfer not resulting in loss of salary or benefits was nonetheless an adverse employment action due to loss of \supervisory duties” and reassignment with \significantly different responsibilities”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).