Skip to main content

Young v. State

Citations

  • 879 A.2d 44
  • 388 Md. 99
  • 2005 Md. LEXIS 432

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • admitting expert report concluding that defendant was “source” of DNA without any accompanying statistics
  • “DNA profiling typically is used to compare a suspect’s DNA with a sample of DNA taken from a crime scene.”
  • evidence of DNA match without accompanying statistical evidence admissible where random match probability “infinitesimal”
  • “when a DNA method analyzes genetic markers at sufficient locations to arrive at an infinitesimal random match probability, expert opinion testimony of a match and of the source of the DNA evidence is admissible”
  • “Testimony describing the methods employed in examining the DNA samples and calculating the match probabilities can lay the foundation for the trial court to determine that a sufficient factual basis exists for the DNA expert to testily to the source of the DNA evidence.”

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Bell, Raker, Wilner, Harrell, Battaglia, Greene, Eldridge

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

23 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

22 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.