State v. Belken

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding ability of an expert to perform accepted testing method affects weight of the evidence
• examining a prejudice claim “in the context of its effect on . . . trial strategy.”
• stating “undisclosed evidence that was merely cumulative” was less likely to be prejudicial
• presuming juries adhere to curative instructions

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).