California Court of Appeal· 5/25/2006
People v. Johnson
Citations
- 43 Cal. Rptr. 3d 587
- 139 Cal. App. 4th 1135
- 2006 Daily Journal DAR 6459
- 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 780
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- Proof regarding the chain of custody is not necessary where the CODIS match is used for further investigation, not as proof of an individual’s guilt
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Ardaiz
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
17 cases in this archive cite this case.
- People v. NelsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2008-06-16· cited 117×
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Supreme Court· 2010-01-25· cited 114×
- People v. TurnerCalifornia Supreme Court· 2020-11-30· cited 114×
- People v. Koua XiongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-04-30· cited 41×
- People v. JonesCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2014-11-26· cited 28×
- People v. CuaCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2011-01-03· cited 20×
- People v. Calvin S.California Court of Appeal· 2007-05-30· cited 15×
- People v. JEHACalifornia Court of Appeal· 2010-08-24· cited 15×
- People v. McCrayCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2006-10-26· cited 11×
- Birotte v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2009-09-08· cited 3×
- People v. RobinsonCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2007-10-26· cited 1×
- The People v. PizarroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-06-13
- The People v. PizarroCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-05-23
- The People v. XiongCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2013-05-02
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher M. BlackCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee· 2010-02-26
- Opinion No. (2010)California Attorney General Reports· 2010-09-09
- People v. LundCalifornia Court of Appeal· 2021-06-01
Cites
50 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Daubert v. Merrell Dow Pharmaceuticals, Inc.Supreme Court· 1993-06-28· cited 21,376×
- Hudson v. PalmerSupreme Court· 1984-07-03· cited 8,014×
- Schmerber v. CaliforniaSupreme Court· 1966-06-20· cited 6,067×
- Frye v. United StatesD.C. Circuit· 1923-12-03· cited 4,204×
- Skinner v. Railway Labor Executives' Assn.Supreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 2,560×
- New Jersey v. T. L. O.Supreme Court· 1985-01-15· cited 2,391×
- Florida v. JimenoSupreme Court· 1991-05-23· cited 2,277×
- United States v. SchefferSupreme Court· 1998-03-31· cited 1,617×
- United States v. KnightsSupreme Court· 2001-12-10· cited 1,478×
- Vernonia School District 47J v. ActonSupreme Court· 1995-06-26· cited 1,470×
- City of Indianapolis v. EdmondSupreme Court· 2000-11-28· cited 1,205×
- National Treasury Employees Union v. Von RaabSupreme Court· 1989-03-21· cited 1,188×
- People v. OchoaCalifornia Supreme Court· 1999-01-27· cited 685×
- People v. KellyCalifornia Supreme Court· 1976-05-28· cited 668×
- Chandler v. MillerSupreme Court· 1997-04-15· cited 524×
- Ferguson v. City of CharlestonSupreme Court· 2001-03-21· cited 523×
- People v. RielCalifornia Supreme Court· 2000-05-18· cited 486×
- People v. PrideCalifornia Supreme Court· 1992-08-06· cited 458×
- People v. FarnamCalifornia Supreme Court· 2002-07-31· cited 457×
- Illinois v. LidsterSupreme Court· 2004-01-13· cited 398×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.