Young v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• noting that the General Assembly has directed Maryland courts not to continue application of the per se exclusionary rule
• finding that jury instructions such as those in this case were sufficient to apprise the jury of its duty to weigh testimony of police officers under the same scrutiny as other witnesses
• finding that jury instructions such as those in this case were sufficient to apprise the jury of its duty to weigh testimony of police officers under the same scrutiny as other witnesses
• “As of July 1,1981, Johnson lost much of its effect. On that date the Maryland legislature abrogated the per se exclusionary rule of Johnson....”
• the Court found that because the police had interrogated the defendant “almost continuously” for twenty-two and one-half hours by means of a relay team, the conduct of the police coupled with the duration of custody and interrogation rendered the defendant’s confession involuntary

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

10 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Spain v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-07· cited 70×
• Williams v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 39×
• Marr v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2000-09-11· cited 25×
• Facon v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2002-02-05· cited 21×
• Hiligh v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 15×
• Odum v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-07· cited 15×
• Perez v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-03· cited 13×
• Bey v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-09-26· cited 12×
• Harper v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-04-28· cited 9×
• State v. Rush
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2007-04-27· cited 9×

Cites

25 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

• Miranda v. Arizona
  Supreme Court· 1966-06-13· cited 58,288×
• Gideon v. Wainwright
  Supreme Court· 1963-03-18· cited 8,419×
• Escobedo v. Illinois
  Supreme Court· 1964-06-22· cited 5,250×
• Spano v. New York
  Supreme Court· 1959-06-22· cited 1,164×
• Dorsey v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1976-01-09· cited 660×
• Carter v. Kentucky
  Supreme Court· 1981-03-09· cited 552×
• Hillard v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-05· cited 136×
• Logan v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-02-11· cited 117×
• Johnson v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-06· cited 98×
• State v. Kidd
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1977-07-18· cited 94×
• Simms v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-11-06· cited 80×
• Lodowski v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-24· cited 74×
• Ralph v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1961-10-13· cited 65×
• Finke v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-08· cited 55×
• Mumford v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1974-01-07· cited 30×
• Scott v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1981-03-11· cited 29×
• State v. Smith
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-03-06· cited 25×
• Bellamy v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1981-10-13· cited 19×
• Meyer v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-09· cited 19×
• Keller v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1967-12-15· cited 19×