Bellamy v. State

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• even though appellate court's exclusion of prosecution evidence makes remaining evidence insufficient, new trial ordered since State may have withheld evidence in reliance on judge's erroneous admission of evidence

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Cited by

16 cases in this archive cite this case.

• Trimble v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1984-08-17· cited 108×
• Hof v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1995-03-10· cited 80×
• Reynolds v. State
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-08-24· cited 67×
• Brodak v. Brodak
  Court of Appeals of Maryland· 1982-07-21· cited 62×
• Finke v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1983-12-08· cited 55×
• Waddell v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-12-16· cited 18×
• Young v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-03· cited 16×
• Perez v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-03· cited 13×
• Pringle v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2001-11-28· cited 10×
• Arky, Freed v. Bowmar Instrument
  District Court of Appeal of Florida· 1987-12-08· cited 8×
• Kwiatkoski v. People
  Supreme Court of Colorado· 1985-10-15· cited 8×
• Hopkins v. State
  Supreme Court of Delaware· 1985-12-18· cited 8×
• Hof v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-12-10· cited 8×
• Brittingham v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1985-05-14· cited 7×
• Gee v. Mass Transit Administration
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1988-05-12· cited 3×
• Zadeh v. State
  Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-29