Court of Special Appeals of Maryland· 4/7/2004
Odum v. State
Citations
- 846 A.2d 445
- 156 Md. App. 184
- 2004 Md. App. LEXIS 34
How courts have described this case
Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.
- “A person may be guilty of a felony, as a principal in the second degree, by aiding, counseling, commanding, or encouraging, either actually or constructively, the commission of the felony in the person’s presence”
- “A person may be guilty of a felony, as a principal in the second degree, by aiding, counseling, commanding or encouraging, either actually or constructively, the commission of the felony in the person’s presence.”
- “At a new trial, a defendant may always file a new motion to suppress, and if the State opposes it, a defendant, in appropriate circumstances may avail himself of ‘the law of the case’ principles. Otherwise, it is a new motion, new hearing, new trial, and new decision.”
Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).
Judges: Murphy, Rodowsky, Getty
Read full opinion on CourtListenerCited by
11 cases in this archive cite this case.
- Taylor v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2016-01-27· cited 35×
- Odum v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2010-02-23· cited 29×
- Freeman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-09-08· cited 24×
- Faulkner v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-04-29· cited 14×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2006-04-11· cited 5×
- Cottman v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2005-10-31· cited 4×
- Moore v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2010-09-03· cited 4×
- State v. LarsonSouth Dakota Supreme Court· 2009-12-09· cited 3×
- Zadeh v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2023-06-29
- State v. GordonSuperior Court of Delaware· 2025-06-18
- Scott v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2025-12-17
Cites
21 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.
- Lockhart v. NelsonSupreme Court· 1988-11-14· cited 1,183×
- State v. HawkinsCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1992-04-13· cited 132×
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-04-06· cited 98×
- State v. WardCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1978-12-21· cited 93×
- Lodowski v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1986-08-22· cited 91×
- Rowe v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2001-04-04· cited 88×
- Gill v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1972-04-12· cited 72×
- Facon v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 50×
- Williams v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 39×
- Southern v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2002-09-17· cited 36×
- McClain v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1980-09-09· cited 33×
- Tu v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1994-10-25· cited 31×
- Osborne v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 1985-10-23· cited 27×
- United States v. Robert L. ChristopherSixth Circuit· 1991-12-10· cited 25×
- Meyer v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1979-10-09· cited 19×
- Mung Sen Tu v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1993-09-29· cited 16×
- Young v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 1986-07-03· cited 16×
- Hiligh v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland· 2003-06-13· cited 15×
- Perez v. StateCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland· 2004-02-03· cited 13×
- Bunge Edible Oil Corp. v. Canadian Pacific (Bermuda) Ltd.Supreme Court· 1992-06-22· cited 13×
Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).
This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.