Skip to main content

Johnson v. Johnson

Citations

  • 638 P.2d 705
  • 131 Ariz. 38
  • 1981 Ariz. LEXIS 267

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

  • holding that pension rights, whether vested or non-vested, are community property insofar as they were earned during the marriage
  • recognizing that a non-employee spouse may be awarded her community interest in the employee spouse’s pension benefits under either the “present cash value method” or the “reserved jurisdiction method”
  • reasoning that when employment benefits are earned, not when they vest, is determinative to assess whether the community acquired an interest
  • upholding “general rule that where either spouse incurs an obligation during marriage for the benefit of the community, that debt is presumed to be a community obligation”
  • If “the tax consequences could be immediately and specifically determined . . . . the court should consider the effects”
  • unmatured pension right is one that does not confer an unconditional right to immediate payment of normal retirement benefits

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).

Judges: Holohan, Struckmeyer, Hays, Cameron, Gordon

Read full opinion on CourtListener

Cited by

48 cases in this archive cite this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Cites

30 cases in this archive are cited by this case; the 20 most cited are listed.

Other cases with this name

Sourced from CourtListener / Free Law Project (CC0).

This is legal information, not legal advice. Laws vary by jurisdiction and change frequently. Always verify current law with official sources and consult a licensed attorney in your jurisdiction for advice on your specific situation.