Beegan v. State, Department of Transportation & Public Facilities

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that the requirements for equitable tolling were satisfied as a matter of law
• holding that the requirements for equitable tolling were satisfied as a matter of law
• holding that the requirements for equitable tolling were satisfied as a matter of law
• explaining that when reviewing a grant of summary judgment, \[alll reasonable inferences are drawn in favor of the nonmovant\
• explaining that when reviewing a grant of summary judgment, \[a]ll reasonable inferences are drawn in favor of the nonmovant\
• involving investigation and potential Alaska State Commission for Human Rights (ASCHR) administrative action against DOT&PF

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).