Bandow v. Bandow

How courts have described this case

Verbatim parenthetical descriptions written by other courts when citing this decision. Ranked by citation-network relevance.

• holding that at least part of annuity given in settlement was divisible; remanded for reapportionment
• holding that tort damages are separate property except where intended to replace pre-divorce lost earnings
• holding that lost earnings component of annuity given to spouse in settlement of medical malpractice claim was marital property to the extent it replaced predivorce lost earnings
• holding that a medical malpractice settlement consisting of an annuity paid in monthly installments was \in fact `property'\ in deciding how to divide that property in a divorce action
• holding that if “parties do not provide sufficient evidence to make a reasonable allocation to a separate estate, [then] the award should be classified as marital property”
• holding that a medical malpractice settlement consisting of an annuity paid in monthly installments was \in fact 'property' \ in deciding how to divide that property in a divorce action

Source: CourtListener parenthetical corpus (CC0).